Skip to main content

GB unvails Olympic kit: Might the wrong colours have been chosen?

Wearers of red team uniforms or kits have been shown to do better than those wearing other colours (Attrill et al, 2008). When sport means so much and outcome is often decided in millimetres or thousandths of a second, we should be doing all we can to help our athletes achieve. I think that the GB Olympic designers may have missed an opportunity here to include more red in the design (it is mainly blue). If it were more red, this may have helped give the GB wearers a boost psychologically that would be reflected in physical performance  - for instance, if the red increased confidence, (positive) aggression and sense that they are dominant, then they are likely to perform closer to their peak performance potential. In addition, there may be negative affects on opponents, facing our athletes wearing significant amounts of red, where they assume a less confident and more submissive position in the sporting contests. While these affects are likely to be small, when it comes to the Olympics, the margins between gold and silver, medal and non-medal, are small, but the difference in reward is huge.

Outside the Olympics, Tiger Woods for years has worn red on the last day of his tournaments, and we all know how dominant he was. Was this something he learned from research, from observation or from his own experience?

Dr Victor Thompson
www.sportspsychologist.com
(This comment was given to the Guardian newspapers on 22 March 2012)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How will athletes react to the news that lifetime drug bans might be overturned by the BOA before the Olympics?

BBC website announces today: ‘Former Olympic triple jump champion Jonathan Edwards is happy the British Olympic Association's lifetime ban for drug cheats looks set to be overturned.’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/17818958   Without going into how we as spectators think or feel about this issue, I’m interested in the impact that this issue might have on other competitors – those competing in the sports that the previously banned athletes compete in. Athlete A:   With a strong sense of right and wrong, Athlete A gets further fired-up and motivated to show the drug cheats that they are better, that they can win clean, expecting their performance to do the talking. This news of allowing, or potentially allowing, the banned athletes back in, is motivating, helping them prepare and perform. Athlete B:   With a belief that the sports officials, system or the world lets them down, Athlete B becomes angry at the developments. They may either get fired-up...

Exercise can be good for stress-relief: Why? Why not share this good news?

Sport and exercise – but not competition for most of us – can be a good way to de-stress. This works for several reasons: It takes us away from stressful situations (home or work) We focus on what we are doing (e.g, chasing a football, hitting the tennis ball, running drills…) and therefore not on life’s problems We have endogenous opiates (‘happy hormones’) released into our bloodstream which feel good We might be exercising or playing sport with positive, encouraging people Those of us who exercise know this already. Perhaps we can share the good news to those who don’t exercise or engage in sport?  Dr Victor Thompson www.sportspsychologist.com

Manchester City’s Roberto Mancini states that Premiership title chase is over: A clever psychological strategy?

(This is based on an interview I gave on Sky Sports News, 12th April 2012) Mancini’s recent statement is at odds with what football managers usually say. We are used to managers being positive about their team in the media, on talking up the team’s hopes, on saying that they are fighting to the end. Instead Mancini has said that the battle for the Premiership title is over, that they will likely finish 3rd, a place he will be happy with, when right now they can mathematically still win. He also spoke about how Manchester United, the team above them, shows much better spirit than City. How Mancini’s statements might work I believe that there are 3 potential advantages to this statement: 1. The Manchester City players, individually or collectively, set out to prove him wrong: that they can win, do better, show spirit… 2. City’s chief rival, Manchester United, takes its foot off the gas, becoming overly confident, complacent, under-prepares and under-plays in the last games....